It's 3:30 (again). In the AM. When I awoke at midnight, hours after reading some Curious George to my son, I made the mistake (or good fortune, really) of switching on the light when I moved to my own bed. I bought a book last week. Ann Patchett's The Patron Saint of Liars. I bought it because I liked the title. It made me think about this small book I had on my bedside table when I was a little girl. It was called Lives of the Saints. And, swear to God, somehow there were saints who'd conveniently died on every day of the calendar year. So I could move through the book each night reading about this saint or that one. How they'd lived and how they'd died. If they'd been martyr'd or murdered. Or thrown themselves off a roof to preserve their virginity. Stuff like that was in this little book. There were gruesome details, too. Maybe not the best bedtime reading for a young girl, after all.
Ann Patchett's book is far better. The novel begins with a woman who becomes pregnant and feels the need to get as far away as she can from the situation in which she's found herself. She drives from California to a home for unwed mothers in Kentucky.
Reading Patchett's novel is bringing back the memory of my pregnant nights, out at my old farmhouse. When the closing of each day involved the slow climb of stairs with my swollen belly propping up a bowl of fruit for me to eat throughout the wee hours. Apples. Oranges. Plums. Grapes. No wonder my Sonshine was such a sweet baby when he was born. Apples for cheeks. Skin soft as peach fuzz. Such a sugary temperament.
The Patron Saint of Liars evokes all those nights I lay in my bed wondering about this baby coming to my arms. You'd think a single mum lying alone in bed with a bursting belly couldn't feel more alone. But the opposite was true for me. I couldn't have felt less alone with the kicking and movement going on towards the homestretch. It was the first time in a long time I didn't feel alone, even the years someone else lay beside me. It felt wonderful. It feels heavenly, still.
So Patchett's novel is stirring up a lot of fond (and poignant) memories for me. The whistle of the wind howling across the backfields through my tall pines. The last snow of my final pre-motherhood winter coating the grass on Mother's Day (3 days before I finally gave birth). The sign of the very pregnant robin in that snow and her nest above my side door as I swept and prepared a room for baby and me. Knowing that I'd have to sell my farmhouse eventually. Leave it. How content I felt curled in my bed out there with my bowl of fruit within reach. With the fruit of my own womb even closer. I can relive exactly my hand reaching out in the dark and peeling a clementine. Swallowing each juicy crescent. The pure joy of finally expecting. The small fears of the unknowns. The brightness of the moon rising over my apple tree and shining into my bedroom window as my own moonbelly waxed towards full.
I admit I envy the women in Patchett's novel. Not the time period in which they felt so judged they were sent or volunteered themselves to go hide away from the world or the need to hand over their newborn to some couple out there to adopt. Never that. But just the...sisterhood. The company. All these unwed mothers holding hands, whispering at night to each other. The storytelling. The 24/7 support.
Reading about Rose, the main character, brought tears to my eyes. I had to put the book down and get up, go into his bedroom, lift him carefully, still asleep and tuck him into my bed to stare at him. I was lying there crying and holding onto his little hands thinking about how much of a miracle he is and I felt compelled to descend my stairs to write. And the first thing I did was google the patron saint of unwed mothers. She's apparently Margaret of Cortona.
Here's the thing. I don't remember her from my little book. Which kind of makes me like her all the more. Wikipedia states, "She is the patron saint of the falsely accused; hoboes; homeless; insane; orphaned; mentally ill; midwives; penitents; single mothers; reformed prostitutes; stepchildren; tramps." I'm pretty sure she would choose to be the patron saint of prostitutes whether they were "reformed" or not. Everybody deserves a patron saint o' their own, you know?
When I grew older, I realized that some of the so-called patron "saints" in that little book were actually goddesses (like the Celtic goddess, Brigid) whom The Church felt the need to canonize, to "christianize" in some way since they couldn't stop the people's worship of them. I think a lot of older world goddesses had "St." slapped in front of their names. The Church had to somehow explain their power, their magnetism, I guess. And some of the saints weren't goddesses. Some of them were just everyday women. But The Church needed to stick "St." in front of their names, too, because God Forbid, they couldn't have just some plain, ol' woman inspiring people or holding any kind of religious sway.
A friend of mine posted this article on facebook tonight. The Church is still afraid of women clearly. That's nothing new. There's a lot of power in women, especially those women whose goal has nothing to do with seeking power. If only The Church could take to heart that kind of lesson in humility itself. But its continuous misogyny, its homophobia, its supreme judgment of others, its exclusionary nature, never mind its scandal-ridden, child-abusing past (and current) state, along with its unending greed for power -- all this will be its own undoing, I believe. That is my one belief about The Church. I don't give it any more credence than that.
Having gone through birth and attended two homebirths, I have witnessed the incredible strength and power of women firsthand. It is exactly what terrifies The Church so much that they even conjured up some kind of tradition to wash away the evil they believed to be inherent in birthing blood, related to God's punishment of Eve that she will "bring forth children in pain" and such. I read about this in Uta Ranke-Heineman's excellent book Eunuchs for the Kingdom of Heaven. I recall sitting in a cafe, relaying to my dear Irish mother this horrible, age-old practice in which women had to be cleansed on the steps before re-entering the church just because they'd given birth. That they were actually considered evil and had to be decontaminated before they could attend mass again. My mother stares at me, somewhat mute and astounded. I continue, "this practice was known as 'churching'," and I'm thinking I am telling her some new detail of The Church's sordid, long-ago past, trying to describe how its misogyny stems from the very beginning. "I was churched," she whispers. And it's my turn to be shocked. "But they made it out to be some kind of...rite to help bring strength to a new mother. A blessing." Of course, they'd couch this ancient, misogynistic practice in such phrases today. Might as well stick "St." in front of a goddess' name, too.
Women don't need strength after giving birth. They've already shown their strength and their power in doing so. Let the men who fear them quake in their holy frocks. Nothing they can do to change that fact. If someone needs to pray to the Patron Saint of Liars, it's The Church.
And here's something else I would say to The Church: say what you want about women. Sisters are doin' it for themselves. And more importantly for others. For the needy, for the disenfranchised. Every day. It's what the founder of your so-called "faith" actually preached. Remember him? I don't recall him sitting on some gold throne, griping about women. If there's one thing I recall from my own Catholic upbringing it's that Jesus hung out with the homeless, the insane, the prostitutes, the mentally ill, the orphaned. Jesus actually liked women. Fancy that. They were his friends. He was man enough not to fear them. His own mother happened to be one of 'em. The Church could learn a lot about how to treat women and children and everyone else on the planet if they'd look to the example of its actual founder. The story of this figure of Jesus strikes me as a leader all about inclusivity versus the rampant exclusivity the modern-day Church seems to espouse.
This post is dedicated to all the single moms out there. All the unwed mothers. The midwives. The doulas. The falsely accused (which is ringing home for me just now). The hoboes and the homeless. Those thought to be insane and those who are insane. The orphaned. The mentally ill. The stepchildren. The stepmothers who love them and don't buy into the stereotypes hollywood and faerytales can make. The prostitutes, both reformed and unreformed. To those women who have helped other women safely end their pregnancies when and where it was (and is still) not legal to do so. To my own mother, whose incredible strength and love taught me how to be a good mommy.
And to Margaret, whoever you were. You had a son, just like me, on your own. I raise this apple in my hand to you as I climb the stairs to bed again. Eating of the fruit of knowledge doesn't seem such a wrong decision after all, hey? Better than living a life in ignorance and denial and getting away with calling it God's word somehow. A lot of nuns out there challenge the closed mind that has long been their church. They challenge it daily. God (if you exist), may You bless them. An open mind, a mind seeking knowledge, with eyes open and learning, witnessing without judging is much more welcoming and comforting than the closed doors or judgment of a church caving in on itself, clinging to a world that is no longer the one in which we now live and breathe.
Amen to that.
June! A List to Celebrate
4 hours ago






















